Author: Alexander Coventry

BAR REPORT – Court rules in favor of expanded representation in administrative child abuse and neglect hearings

The Appellate Division held that substantiation of a child abuse charge is a consequence of magnitude sufficient to warrant the appointment of counsel for an indigent defendant.

Comparing the substantiation of a child abuse and neglect charge that results in a listing on the child abuse registry to a “governmentally-imposed scarlet letter,” the Appellate Division held that indigent parents or guardians facing such a charge are entitled to counsel at both the administrative level and any appeal as of right. The published decision, DCPP v. L.O., reverses the final agency decision and remands the matter back for a new administrative hearing. The New Jersey State Bar Association participated as amicus curiae, arguing that because inclusion on the child abuse registry is confidential and does not trigger the termination of parental rights, listing on the registry is not a “consequence of magnitude” triggering the right to counsel. The association further argued that if the court were to find the right to counsel, the representation should be provided by knowledgeable, experienced counsel through a state-funded source, and not through the random assignment of pro bono counsel. NJSBA Trustee Amy E. Vasquez argued the matter on behalf of the association.

Prenups and High Net Worth Divorces: Do They Solve Everything?

While any high net worth individual might consider a prenuptial agreement to be an ironclad contract, New York state law might not agree. New York is one of the few states which hasn’t adopted the Uniform Prenuptial Agreement Act (UPAA). New York has its own set of rules and laws for these types of agreements.

A prenuptial agreement is designed to help avoid chaos, strife and acrimony should a divorce occur in that marriage. However, as evidenced by the recent attention-grabbing stories involving Robert De Niro, “prenups” are not able to solve every problem that arises in a divorce, even when the terms are clearly spelled out and agreed upon beforehand.